2024年9月大众英语测验一级备考冲刺试题

相干保举

　　不管是身处黉舍仍是步入社会，咱们常常跟试题打交道，试题是参考者回首所学常识和技术的首要参考材料。甚么样的试题才是迷信标准的试题呢？上面是小编清算的2024年9月大众英语测验一级备考冲刺试题，供大师参考鉴戒，但愿能够赞助到有须要的伴侣。

2024年9月大众英语测验一级备考冲刺试题

　　9月大众英语测验一级备考冲刺试题 1

　　Contribution of Coeducation

　　Imagining being asked to spend twelve or so years of your life in a society which consisted only of members of own sex. How would you react? Unless there was something definitely wrong with you， you wouldn’t be too happy about it， to say the least. It is all the more surprising therefore that so many parents in the world choose to impose such abnormal conditions on their children - conditions which they themselves wouldn’t put up with for one minute!

　　Any discussion of this topic is bound to question the aims of education. Stuffing children’s heads full of knowledge is far from being foremost among them. One of the chief aims of educations is to equip future citizens with all they require to take their place in adult society. Now adult society is made up of men and women， so how can a segregated school possibly offer the right sort of preparation for it? Anyone entering adult society after years of segregation can only be in for a shock.

　　A co-educational school offers children nothing less than a true version of society in miniature. Boys and girls are given the opportunity to get to know each other， to learn to live together from their earliest years. They are put in a position where they can compare themselves with each other in terms of academic ability， athletic achievement and many of the extra-curricular activities which are part of school life. What a practical advantage it is ( to give just a small example ) to be able to put on a school play in which the male parts will be taken by boys and the female parts by girls! What nonsense co-education makes of the argument that boys are cleverer than girl or vice-versa. When segregated， boys and girls are made to feel that they are a race apart. Rivalry between the sexes is fostered. In a coeducational school， everything falls into its proper place.

　　But perhaps the greatest contribution of co-education is the healthy attitude to life it encourages. Boys don’t grow up believing that women are mysterious creatures - airy goddesses， more like book-illustrations to a fairy-tale， than human beings. Girls don’t grow up imagining that men are romantic heroes. Years of living together at school dispel illusions of this kind. There are no goddesses with freckles， pigtails， piercing voices and inky fingers. There are no romantic heroes with knobbly knees， dirty fingernails and unkempt hair. The awkward stage of adolescence brings into sharp focus some of the physical and emotional problems involved in growing up. These can better be overcome in a co-educational environment. Segregated schools sometimes provide the right conditions for sexual deviation. This is hardly possible under a co-educational system. When the time comes for the pupils to leave school， they are fully prepared to enter society as well-adjusted adults. They have already had years of experience in coping with many of the problems that face men and women.

　　1. What is the best title for this passage?

　　A、 only co-education can be in harmony with society.

　　B、 people are in great need of co-education.

　　C、 any form of education other than co-education is simply unthinkable.

　　D、 co-education has many features.

　　2. what does co-education offer to children?

　　A、 A society.

　　B、 A true small model of society.

　　C、 A real life.

　　D、 True version of social condition.

　　3. According to the passage， what is one of the chief aims of education?

　　A、 It is for students to acquire knowledge.

　　B、 It is to equip future citizens with scientific technology.

　　C、 It is to equip future citizens with what is required in getting a position in society.

　　D、 It is for students to get academic achievements.

　　4. Why do boys and girls in co-education have no illusion about each other?

　　A、 They live together and know each other too well.

　　B、 Years of living together at school dismiss such illusion.

　　C、 co-education encourage them to have an healthy attitude toward life.

　　D、 They are familiar with each other’s problems.

　　Vocabulary

　　1. to be in for = receive 　接管

　　He is in for punishment.　他遭到赏罚。

　　2. miniature 　缩样，雏形，微型画

　　3. freckle　斑点

　　4. pigtail 　鞭子

　　5. knobbly = knobby　多节的

　　6. unkempt　参差不齐，蓬乱的

　　7. sharp focus = clear view

　　bring into focus 　使集合在核心上，对光

　　bring into sharp focus　这里的意思是：一目明了，较着凸起

　　8. deviation 　越轨，偏离，入邪路

　　谜底详解

　　1. C 　除男女合校，其余情势的教导的确难以假想。谜底见第一段“假想请你在一个只要你一样性别的人存在的社会糊口12年风景，你会若何反映呢?除非你本身切当有弊端，不然，你最少不会太欢快。是以，天下上有那末多的怙恃情愿把这类不一般的环境(他们本身一分钟都受不了的环境)强加给他们的孩子们，这太使人惊奇!”第二段讲“教导的目标之一便是为将来的国民在成人社会中找一席之地，筹办好须要的统统。而社会由男女构成，那分校又怎能筹办?”后两段讲合校之长处，分校之错误谬误，详细对照凸起主题。这都申明C 最适合。

　　A. 只要合校能力和社会相调和。

　　D. 合校有很多特色。这两项文章内容触及到，但作为最好标题则不切当。

　　B. 人们很是须要合校。文内不间接谈到。

　　2. B 　一个实在社会的缩影。这在第三段第一句“男女合校切当能给孩子们供给一个社会实在的缩影。”上面的内容都是环绕这个主题而写的详细环境。如：糊口在一路，相互领会，对照等。

　　A. 社会。

　　C. 一种实在的糊口。

　　D. 实在的社会环境。都不B项那样切当。

　　3. C 　为将来国民在社会上具有一席之地，筹办好所须要的统统。这在第二段“这个话题的会商一定会引出教导目标的题目。把各类常识塞进孩子脑筋远不是教导首要的目标，教导的首要目标之一是为将来国民在成人社会求得一席之地，筹办好所需统统。”

　　A. 先生学到只是。

　　B. 以科技武装将来国民。

　　C.为先生缺德学术成绩。都只是常识进修的一个局部。

　　4.B 　几年黉舍配合糊口撤销了空想。谜底在第四段中，“在黉舍中，几年糊口在一路消弭这一类的空想。不甚么脸上有斑点，梳着鞭子，涂着指甲，尖的乐音的女神，也不膝部有疙瘩，指甲脏兮兮，头发乱蓬蓬的浪漫豪杰。辣手的芳华期较着显现出来的生长进程中身材上和豪情上的题目，在男女合校环境中取得很好的处置。”

　　A. 他们糊口在一路，相互太领会。此谜底过分，不是太领会而不发生空想，而是领会环境；真人就在面前，人就现实了，消弭空想。

　　C. 合校鼓动勉励他们对糊口有一种安康主动的立场。这是合校的风雅向，不是消弭空想的底子缘由。

　　D. 他们熟习相互的题目。不满是消弭空想之因，而是处置题目标前奏。这在最初一段最初两句话有申明“当先生离校的时辰离开时，他们已经是很有顺应性的成人，为进入社会做好了充实筹办。他们已有几年处置面对男女的很多题目标经历。”

　　9月大众英语测验一级备考冲刺试题 2

　　Vicious and Dangerous Sports Should be Banned by Law

　　When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s amazing how little we have developed in other respects.We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas.We may despise them because they mistook these goings on for entertainment.We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better.But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Don’t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remains as bloodthirsty as ever they were.The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungey lions tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age； sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.

　　It really is incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames.Let us not deceive ourselves.Any talk of ‘the sporting spirit’ is sheer hypocrisy.People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring.Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence.A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news.Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen.They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.

　　Why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask.The answer is simple: they are uncivilized.For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally - admittedly with little success.But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past.Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be.Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world.Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly.These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law.The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence.If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improving mankind.We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.

　　1.It can be inferred from the passage that the author’s opinion of nowadays’ human beings is

　　A.not very high.

　　B.high.

　　C.contemptuous.

　　D.critical.

　　2.The main idea of this passage is

　　A.vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law.

　　B.people are willing to pay vast sums money to see violence.

　　C.to compare two different attitudes towards dangerous sports.

　　D.people are bloodthirsty in sports.

　　3.That the author mentions the old Romans is

　　A.To compare the old Romans with today’s people.

　　B.to give an example.

　　C.to show human beings in the past know nothing better.

　　D.to indicate human beings are used to bloodthirsty.

　　4.How many dangerous sports does the author mention in this passage?

　　A.Three.

　　B.Five.

　　C.Six.

　　D.Seven.

　　5.The purpose of the author in writing this passage is

　　A.that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve our selves.

　　B.that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the law.

　　C.that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare system.

　　D.to show law is the main instrument of social change.

　　Vocabulary

　　1.relish 从……取得乐处，享用

　　2.orgy 狂欢，纵容

　　3.arena 竞技场，勾当或奋斗的场合

　　4.blood-thirsty 暴虐的，嗜血的

　　5.bear-baiting 逗熊游戏

　　6.bull-fight 斗牛

　　7.batter 猛击，持续地猛打/捶，乱打

　　8.pulp 成纸浆，成软块

　　9.burst into flames 俄然熄灭起来/着火

　　10.grim 使人梗塞的，粗陋的

　　11.coop up 把……关起来

　　谜底详解

　　1.A.不太高。文章一起头就点出科技庞大进步，而其余方面停顿很少。人们以不放在眼里的口吻谈及不幸的古罗马人，由于他们赏识竞技场上的搏斗。咱们不放在眼里他们，由于他们把这些搏斗视为文娱。咱们能够降阶/屈尊地体谅他们，由于他们糊口在2000年前，明显，对好的东西不晓得。在这里作者反诘，咱们的优胜感是否是准确呢?咱们的嗜血性是否是少一些?为甚么拳击比赛吸收那末很多人?在场的抚玩者(观众)是否是也但愿看到一些暴力呢?论断是：人类和曩昔一样暴虐。独一的差别点在于古罗马人很诚笃，他们认可他们赏识旁观饥饿的狮子把人撕碎，活生生吃掉，而咱们会找出各类精炼的来由来保卫早该避免的勾当。第二段举出详细例子，如斗牛、拳击中把人打瘫在地、车赛中，车子碰撞动怒，人们就座在那边旁观赏识，参赛者是为了高人为，观众支出大笔财帛是为了看到暴力。作者指出任何体育精力的说法纯洁是虚假。若是一场打比赛(天下分量级冠军赛)，两轮而不是十五轮就告竣事，成千上百万人们会感应绝望――这些都证实人的卑下，不文化。这两段仿佛也证实作者的概念应当是C项――鄙弃的。但在第三段谈及，好几个世纪以来，人们一向试图在精力上和感情上改良本身，又得认可不怎样胜利。可最少咱们不再容忍疯人监禁于笼中，当众抨击，和其余很多曩昔遍及存在的蛮横行动。牢狱也不再是曩昔那种使人梗塞的监禁之地，社会福利轨制在全天下很多处所奉行。在财产公允分派上也作了很大的尽力。这些变更的呈现不是由于人俄然改良，而是在转变法令上采用了主动的步骤。若是咱们避免风险的暴力体育名目，那末咱们在改良人类方面又进步了一步。咱们会熟悉暴力是人类的出错和卑下(人类不应有的)。从这段来看，作者对人类还抱有但愿，不是很鄙弃。以是选A项。

　　2.A.法令应避免出错而又风险的体育名目。见第一题正文。作者从古罗马人赏识暴虐的体育名目提及，点呈古代人也是嗜血成性，喜好暴力体育名目。这是不文化，是出错。必须避免，而法令是咱们社会鼎新最壮大的东西，它可利用，阐扬壮大的文化影响(第三段倒数第三句)

　　B.人们情愿付出庞大金钱来旁观暴力。这是作者申明“嗜血成性”的详细内容之一。

　　C.对照对风险体育名目差别的立场。这里不对照。

　　D.人类嗜血成性。这是作者以为人们为甚么赏识风险暴虐体育名目标本源。

　　3.D.人们在体育上习气于“嗜血成性”，曩昔是，此刻依然是，差别点只是前者爽直认可，后者委婉粉饰。见第一题正文。

　　A.把古罗马人和古代人对照。这项不申明对照甚么。

　　B.给出一个例子。太笼统。

　　C.申明曩昔人类不太晓得更美好的东西，这两项都不到位。

　　4.B.5个。作者提到

　　⑴逗熊游戏；

　　⑵斗牛；

　　⑶车赛；