- 相干保举
ACT写作测验注重事变
改版后的ACT写作测验除给你一个写作总分，另有四个大才能单项分。每一个阅卷的歪果仁可都有一双火眼金睛，他们可以或许在无限时辰内疾速找出同窗们写的这篇作文里的各大“采分点”，为了通关ACT写作测验，
起首，作文的开首段不求你利用各类高峻上长难句，你可以或许终究没能让阅卷教员大白你的意义，反而让他感觉你逻辑紊乱。开首起首清楚的交接要写的话题，和对这个话题你的态度是甚么。注重同窗们，你的态度要表现你对这个controversial issue 的代价判定，你感觉它是好啊仍是坏啊仍是你想对这个标题题目坚持中立态度都ok,但你不要摆一个fact，那即是顾摆布而言他。你必须让阅卷人立即晓得你对这个标题题目的概念，也便是你论证主体局部要撑持或否决的内容。
其次，日常平凡的写作课倡议同窗们用2-3个段落作为论证的主体段落，因为新版ACT写作测验有一个新请求，即标题题目中给的perspective1,2,3你必须全数停止回应，这就请求同窗们在底稿纸上写essay map停止brainstorming时要把这三个已给出的论点都斟酌出来。有的同窗在日常平凡的写作课上曾有过如许的.疑难，会不会有哪一个perspective我其实没法跟我的态度接洽上？不会的。对和你态度一样的perspective，你只要提一下，把它拉到你方营垒，而后持续论证你的概念，而对跟你态度不一样的perspective，和你不一样的缘由有两种。第一，它可以或许和你会商这个标题题目的角度不同，可是内容公道，你归结一下你们都想说哪一大类的内容，而后你的论证角度是甚么；第二，你可以或许底子不同意它表述的内容，那末你指出你哪不待见它便可，而后接着论证你的概念。倡议大师在段起首写topic sentence,若是哪一个perspective和你本段概念类似，提一两句。而后接着论证你的本段态度。或先指出和你态度不一样的perspective，你不同意它哪了，而后本段你的态度又是甚么，接着仍是持续论证你的概念。最初在每段开头加一个conclusion 停止总结或transition停止承先启后，也便是给阅卷人再重申一下你本段的态度，加深印象，也表现了你论证的周密。究竟结果是persuasive essay,写的formal些啦。
在我的这篇考前碎碎念的最初，我想跟同窗们讲一下你的文章的最初一段，你可以或许当时辰已没甚么时辰了，万万别吓尿，给文章加个开头很简略的。开头不求长篇大论瞻望将来神马的，一句话同样成哈，便是重申一下这个标题题目你的态度，便是paraphrase 一下thesis statement啦! 祝烤生们都能获得一个抱负的写作成就！
附:官网给出的新版ACT写作样题和官网给出的满分例文
Intelligent Machines
Many of the goods and services we depend on daily are now supplied by intelligent, automated machines rather than human beings. Robots build cars and other goods on assembly lines, where once there were human workers. Many of our phone conversations are now conducted not with people but with sophisticated technologies. We can now buy goods at a variety of stores without the help of a human cashier. Automation is generally seen as a sign of progress, but what is lost when we replace humans with machines? Given the accelerating variety and prevalence of intelligent machines, it is worth examining the implications and meaning of their presence in our lives.
Read and carefully consider these perspectives. Each suggests a particular way of thinking about the increasing presence of intelligent machines.
Perspective One
What we lose with the replacement of people by machines is some part of our own humanity. Even our mundane daily encounters no longer require from us basic courtesy, respect, and tolerance for other people.
Perspective Two
Machines are good at low-skill, repetitive jobs, and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. In both cases they work better than humans. This efficiency leads to a more prosperous and progressive world for everyone.
Perspective Three
Intelligent machines challenge our long-standing ideas about what humans are or can be. This is good because it pushes both humans and machines toward new, unimagined possibilities.
Essay Task
Write a unified, coherent essay in which you evaluate multiple perspectives on the increasing presence of intelligent machines. In your essay, be sure to:
analyze and evaluate the perspectives given
state and develop your own perspective on the issue
explain the relationship between your perspective and those given
Your perspective may be in full agreement with any of the others, in partial agreement, or wholly different. Whatever the case, support your ideas with logical reasoning and detailed, persuasive examples.
官网满分例文：
As technology improves, and more and more tasks are completed by machines instead of humans, the question is no longer about what we can do with machines, but rather what we should. Although the usage of machines increases efficiency and our standard of living, it detracts from the value of human life.
As machines increasingly perform all our basic tasks, society is able to produce more. The additional production adds material value to our society and frees people up from these low-skill tasks. This is in agreement with Perspective Two which claims that this industrialization leads to more prosperity.// For example, in the 18th century, short-staple cotton that was grown in the Southern United States required an immense amount of labor in order to separate the seeds from the fiber to process the cotton to make it marketable. However, in the mid-19th century, Eli Whitney, an American entrepreneur, invented the cotton gin, which allowed for automation of cotton processing. This machine replaced the need of a large work force for the process and greatly improved production. As a result of the cotton gin, short-staple cotton production skyrocketed, increasing by more than 10 times in the South while bringing prosperity to the region and setting in motion a new industrial era in America. This is in agreement with Perspective Three, which says that mechanization allows for “unimagined possibilities”. Although there are clearly many advantages to industrialization, there are also some heavy drawbacks.
The replacement of humans by machines leads to the loss of value to human life, an effect that outweighs the material gains of automation. The search to find human tasks that can be performed by machines inevitably leads to comparisons between the human and the machine.// If a company executive wants to see if a inventory management team can be replaced by a robotic system, he will compare the two and determine which can do a better job. When this occurs, the people on the team are evaluated not for their worth as human beings, but for their effectiveness at performing a specific function—in essence, as we would evaluate a machine. In a larger sense, when we begin to think about humans in this way, the worth of a person’s life becomes dependent on only what they can do and no longer has any intrinsic value. As Perspective One states, we begin to lose our humanity. This new mindset and way of evaluating people, though seemingly harmless in the workplace, is devastating when it begins to pervade a society. If a person is judged only on his or her capability, there is no reason for a person to remain after they have served their function. This would warrant genocide against the elderly and the disabled because their burden on society would not be made up for by any production. Although the machines may seem to only fulfill the low skill jobs at the moment, there is no barrier to prevent the machines from replacing more. As the machines increase in intelligence, they will replace any tasks done by humans and render us unnecessary and worthless.
Due to the risks of dehumanization, the material benefits of machines are not enough to justify its increasing presence.
【ACT写作测验注重事变】相干文章：
SAT与ACT测验比拟04-14
act2021年测验时辰01-28
SAT与ACT测验十大较着不同04-12
2018年act测验时辰是甚么时辰11-17
写作的注重事变05-25
报告写作的注重事变05-03
公文写作注重事变05-03
英语写作注重事变11-05